1. The Defendant’s KRW 50,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from July 10, 2012 to October 28, 2014, and the following.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff, as a juristic person established for the purpose of compensating for an employee’s occupational accident by being entrusted with the insurance business by the Minister of Employment and Labor under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”), was paid insurance benefits under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act to the victim A (hereinafter “victim”).

B as a driver or owner of a vehicle with C2.5 tons C2.5 tons (hereinafter referred to as “instant sea vehicle”), a person who was injured by the victim, and the Defendant is a liability insurer for the instant sea vehicle.

B. On January 15, 201, around 14:00 on January 15, 201, the instant accident: (a) stopped the instant melting vehicle for the purpose of maintaining and repairing the signboards of a mixed automatic store located in the Gu monthly-dong (replacement of indoor light light, etc.); and (b) during the maintenance and repair work, the vehicle was on board and using a remote controler along with the victim; and (c) during the maintenance and repair work, the vehicle fell at a height of 2 meters; and (d) the victim fell at a level of 2 meters.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”). The victim was injured by the instant accident, such as a cage catus catus, etc.

C. From the time of the instant accident to July 9, 2012, the Plaintiff paid KRW 26,033,480 for medical care benefits, temporary disability compensation benefits, KRW 34,024,540 for the victim, and KRW 83,735,870 for disability benefits, pursuant to the Industrial Accident Insurance Act.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 11, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of recognition of the above liability for damages, although B had been operated after the safety inspection of the diskettes of the instant sea-going vehicle and the part of the instant sea-going vehicle, it was negligent and the instant accident occurred, so the Defendant, as the insurer of the said vehicle, is liable to compensate the victim for the damages caused by the instant accident.

3. The following damages, except as set out below, shall be charged: