The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. The sentence of the lower court against the accused (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is not a good crime in light of the method, period, and amount of damage, etc. of crime by deceiving the defendant to impair the right of airline tickets, etc. to travel of Japan and by deceiving the victims to acquire money of a considerable amount of money.

However, the defendant recognized all of his errors and again did not prevent such errors, and the majority of the victims agreed to reach an agreement in the trial, and substantial repayment of considerable part of the amount of damages was made.

In full view of the various circumstances, including the above circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the offense, means and consequence, etc., and the circumstances after the offense, the lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is with merit.

[Discied reasoning of the judgment below] Criminal facts and summary of evidence recognized by the court is the same as that of each corresponding column of the judgment below, and thus, they are cited as it is in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The sentence shall be determined as ordered prior to the grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1448, Apr. 2, 2