1. The Plaintiff:

A. The Defendants B, C, and D General Assembly shall jointly and severally take place between KRW 181,110,184 and those related thereto from December 30, 2015.

1. Determination on the claim for indemnity

A. Facts of recognition 1) The legal relationship of the Plaintiff and the process of the relevant lawsuit in Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Seoul Metropolitan City”).

[Attachment 1] The real estate listed in the [Attachment 1] List (hereinafter “instant funeral hall”).

The Plaintiff is the owner of the instant funeral hall. The Plaintiff operated the instant funeral hall from April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2009 through a bid for use in 2006 conducted by the head of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City G Hospital under the Seoul Special Metropolitan City’s control, and thereafter, operated the instant funeral hall from April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2012 through a bid for use in 2009. However, a third party was selected in a bid for use in 2012 as a successful bidder. As the said period of use expires, the Plaintiff was permitted to temporarily operate the instant funeral hall from April 1, 2012 to April 15, 2012. The Plaintiff was permitted to temporarily operate the instant funeral hall from April 1, 2012 to April 15, 2012.

(2) The Seoul Special Metropolitan City filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff on May 7, 2012 for the return of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rental fee for the funeral hall of this case against the Plaintiff and the APS Association on February 14, 2013, “the Plaintiff and A PPS Association shall jointly and severally pay the Plaintiff 302,105,220 won a year from April 16, 2012 to the completion date of delivery of the funeral hall of this case” (the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2012Kahap890, 2012Gahap26928), and the Seoul High Court Decision 2013Da21384, August 29, 2013 (the Plaintiff’s appeal was dismissed on April 21, 2012).