1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on October 24, 2013 under the short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status as a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Austria (hereinafter referred to as “ASEAN”), and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on May 22, 2014.

B. On July 7, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff cannot be deemed as having a well-founded fear that he would suffer from persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee”) and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. On July 22, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on July 22, 2015, but the said objection was dismissed on December 14, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2 evidence, Eul 1 and 2 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

가. 원고의 주장 원고는 이그보(Igbo)족 기독교도인데, 1990년대부터 보코 하람(Boko Haram)의 소속인들을 군대나 정부에 넘기는 일을 하는 CJTF(Civilian Joint Task Force)에서 일을 하였다는 이유로 보코 하람이 원고를 죽이려 하여 2008. 6.경 포티스쿰시 소재 모스코라인마켓 근처에서 자살폭탄테러로 부친과 삼촌이 사망하였고, 그 후 원고에 대해서도 신원을 모르는 남자가 산채로 화형될 것이라고 협박을 하여 원고는 2009. 7.경 나이지리아를 출국하여 여러 나라를 전전하다가 대한민국에 와서 난민신청을 하게 된 것이다.

In the event that the plaintiff returned to Naria, the disposition of this case which did not recognize the plaintiff as a refugee is unlawful despite the possibility of persecution damage from Boco damage.

B. (1) In full view of the provisions of Article 2 Subparag. 1 and Article 18 of the Refugee Act, Article 1 of the Refugee Convention, and Article 1 of the Refugee Protocol, race, religion, nationality, and nationality;