1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: each “attached list” among the judgments of the court of first instance shall be deemed as “a list of the judgment of the court of first instance”; each “208.......”; the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as “2018..”; and the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as “a value-free land itself prior to the division of this case.” The subsequent part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following additional judgments as to the main safety defense at

(However, the part on the joint plaintiff B of the first instance court, which was separately confirmed, is excluded). 2. The defendant's defense as to the main safety defense at the time of defendant Jong-si cannot dispute the cancellation of the attachment registration based on the delinquent local tax in the civil procedure.

However, the plaintiff is seeking the cancellation of the registration of seizure based on ownership, which eventually constitutes civil procedure because it claims the exclusion of interference with ownership.

Therefore, the above defense is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.