The defendant is innocent.

1. 공소사실의 요지 피고인의 사용인인 C는 업무에 관하여 피고인 소속 D 11톤 카고트럭을 1993. 5. 15. 04:20경 국도 42호선 경기 여주군 여주읍 상리 소재 과적차량 검문소에서 제2축이 11.4톤, 제3축이 11.8톤으로 축중 제한규정인 10톤을 초과한 �적상태로 위 트럭을 운전하였다.

2. The prosecutor charged a public action by applying Article 86 and Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; hereinafter “former Road Act”) to the facts charged in the instant case. However, according to the Constitutional Court Order 201Hun-Ga24, Nov. 29, 201, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 1010, Nov. 29, 201; hereinafter “former Road Act”) that “where an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under subparagraph 1 of Article 84 in connection with the business of the corporation, the portion of the fine under the relevant Article shall be imposed on the corporation retroactively becomes void.”

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.