beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 5,000,000, respectively.
The Defendants respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who operates “D” to perform construction, design, and interior works, and Defendant B, as a complaint of “D”, has been operating the said “D” jointly with Defendant A, a South-North Korea, around 2010.
1. Since the Defendants were unable to economically due to the existing obligation for the construction cost, the Defendants were willing to enter into a contract with the subcontractor, such as removal, cooling and heating facilities, even though they did not seem to have been awarded a contract for a new interior construction at a lower price for the construction cost, the Defendants were willing to enter into a contract with the subcontractor, even though they did not seem to have been awarded a contract for a new interior construction work at a lower price for the construction cost.
On June 15, 201, the Defendants concluded a contract for the construction of air-conditioning and heating facilities within the original city “H hospital” located in G with the victim F at the original city office No. 205 of the E building 205 in the original city, and Defendant B said, Defendant B said, “When commencing the construction, Defendant A said that “I will immediately pay the down payment of KRW 17 million to the victim,” and Defendant A said that “I will promptly pay the down payment of KRW 17 million and pay the remainder as soon as possible.”
However, in fact, the Defendants paid the unpaid construction cost related to the existing construction works in several million won, and the total amount of the liabilities incurred due to the construction and personal reasons was also the company’s funds and the Defendants’ revenue assets, and there is no reason for the Defendants to use the payment for the payment of the construction cost in most cases even if the Defendants received part of the construction cost from the H Hospital, so there is no intention or ability to pay the subcontracted construction cost as agreed by the victims.
As above, the Defendants deceiving the victim and let the victim do so. From June 16, 201 to July 1, 201, the Defendants were above.