logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.05.30 2016고정515
영유아보육법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the head of the 'D Child Care Center' located in Gangwon-gun C.

No person who operates a child-care center shall receive subsidies by fraud or other improper means.

Nevertheless, the defendant's spouse who is driving the above child-care center driver's vehicle is a child-care teacher who actually takes care of children due to the birth of his spouse E with the first class certificate of infant-care teacher's license, and the same year as the child-care center teacher on March 2, 2016, as the child-care integrated information system.

4. 4. On March 24, 2016, the Plaintiff was registered as the “Fashion 2 half” teacher and received KRW 100,000 for treatment improvement expenses for three months from the NongHyup account F in the name of E on March 24, 2016, and was denied total of KRW 1,737,660 over ten times, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached crime list.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on administrative disposition plans, such as hearing records;

1. Article 54 (2) 1 of the Act on the Protection of Young Children and the Selection of a fine for the crime, Article 54 of the same Act and Article 54 of the same Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant's assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the provisional payment order is alleged to the effect that the defendant was not unlawfully paid subsidies, such as aiding and abetting the child's child care.

However, according to the evidence in the above holding, the Defendant and the defense counsel’s above assertion are not accepted since the date of March 2016, 2016, where two children, who are infant care teachers, were in charge of the care of the colon on March 3, 2016 and were in charge of the care of the colon, and since March 3, 2016, I, a infant care teacher, were in charge of the care of the colon, and they were in charge of the coloned with other children.

The grounds for sentencing include the circumstances, amount, character and behavior of the defendant, environment, and circumstances after the crime.

arrow