The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (three years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. Determination is an element for sentencing favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes in this case and reflected, the profit acquired by the defendant is part of the amount of damage, the fact that the defendant's will and his family members submit a written application for carbon, and it appears that the social relation of the defendant is deep, and the defendant has no criminal record other than a fine of 1.5 million won due to drinking driving in around 2005.

However, a large amount of damage caused by each of the crimes of this case reaches 1.576 million won in total, and the crime of this case is a fraudulent act committed by forging a disposal document, and the nature of the crime is very poor. In the course of the crime of this case, the defendant served as an indispensable role in attracting customers, filing a bank loan application, preparing a false employment certificate, etc., forging an application for issuance of a lessor's resident registration certificate, and receiving fees, etc. during the crime of this case. This is an essential role in performing the above systematic fraud, and the defendant committed the crime independently from C from the end of 2013 to the end of 2013, led with E, and the defendant committed the crime, such as that the defendant did not agree with the victims or recovered the damaged amount, and that the defendant escaped to avoid punishment, and other various sentencing factors specified in the arguments of this case, the sentence of the court below against the defendant is proper.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.