1. The part of the first instance judgment against the Plaintiff corresponding to the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings as to the cause of the claim Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including branch numbers) and the purport of the entire pleadings, the plaintiff engaged in the business of manufacturing new parts of the new parts from March 10, 2017 to September 20, 2018 is obligated to pay only 14,737,50 won out of the price of the goods for the new parts supplied by the plaintiff (hereinafter "price of the goods in this case") supplied by the defendant during the above period. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay the above money and its delayed damages to the plaintiff (in relation to the trade in this case, the plaintiff submitted trade books, order documents, and specifications of the transaction list, most coincides with the transaction books, order documents, most of the transaction list, date and time, product name, unit price, quantity, cumulative supply price of the new parts, and the details and balance of the transaction list, the transaction details and balance are consistent.

Unless there are any circumstances to see that both the Plaintiff and the Defendant have the product number of 3018-5930 won and the product number of 1,050 won is the product number of 3018-5930 won. In light of the fact that the transaction statement submitted by the Plaintiff also includes 1,050 won in the transaction statement, credibility of the contents indicated in the above transaction account book, order sheet, and transaction statement can be recognized). Meanwhile, the Plaintiff is obliged to pay 378,000 won (new launch, product number 3018-5930, unit price 1,050 won) from the Defendant for the same period after receiving an order of 360 won from the Defendant to receive it, but the Defendant unilaterally cancelled the order and failed to deliver the above new product. Thus, the Defendant is obligated to pay 378,000 won in addition to the above goods price to the Plaintiff.

One of the arguments is that the plaintiff created a new job as above.