1. Defendant A’s 56,918,050 won and the Plaintiff’s 5% per annum from December 13, 2004 to February 11, 2005, and the following:

1. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendants on the claim amount claim by Daegu District Court 2005Kadan11395, the Daegu District Court 2005Kadan11395, and the decision of recommending reconciliation was made on May 31, 2005. The fact that the above decision of recommending reconciliation became final and conclusive on June 18, 2005 does not conflict between the parties, or is recognized by the statement in Gap evidence 1.

Since the instant lawsuit for preventing the completion of extinctive prescription has a benefit of lawsuit, the Defendants are obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount according to the final settlement recommendation decision as stated in the text.

2. The defendants' assertion that the plaintiff's claim should be dismissed because the plaintiff filed a lawsuit with the same content and obtained a final judgment against the plaintiff, and the Daegu Family Court shall obtain an inheritance limited approval.

However, as seen above, the decision of recommending a compromise with the same contents as the written order is finalized, and the decision of recommending a compromise is decided to pay the money “within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased F” by reflecting the fact that Defendant B, C, D, and E obtained the inheritance-limited approval in the settlement recommendation. Thus, the Defendants’ assertion cannot be acknowledged.

3. The plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is accepted as the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.