The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The crime of this case was committed while the defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a female-friendly job offering co-defendant, and the defendant and co-defendant was under the influence of alcohol while drinking, disregarding the victim E (the age of 25) who drinks alcohol with the defendant and the co-defendant with the court below. On the ground that the crime of this case was brought about, the defendant and the above co-defendant went beyond the floor of the victim E with the above co-defendant, and went against the victim E with drinking and drinking and walking the victim at about seven weeks of treatment due to drinking and drinking, and suffered an injury, such as internal breathy, etc., which requires about seven weeks of treatment. The crime of this case was committed in light of the method and motive of the crime, including cruelness of the crime, and its consequence, and the crime of this case is very bad, and the crime was committed in light of the motive and motive of the crime.

Although the victims were at the disadvantage of the defendant, the defendant continued to walk the face of the victims due to the outbreak, etc., and the taxi engineer who observed this was living away from the police with the victims who caused the defect in the report.

As a result of the Defendant’s crime of this case, not only the victims suffered serious injuries, but also the mental impulse and suffering caused by the crime of this case seems to have been very serious.

On August 6, 2018, the Defendant received a fine of KRW 3 million due to the crime of injury and committed the instant crime before the lapse of one year.

Considering these points, there is a need to punish the defendant for strict punishment.

However, the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and divided the errors in depth, and the defendant paid 10 million won to the victims of Marasia late in the first instance.