All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the punishment (such as Defendant A: imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months, Defendant B: imprisonment with prison labor for a year and four months, etc.) declared by the court below to the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. There are extenuating circumstances, such as the Defendants’ confessions of each of the instant crimes and reflects their mistakes, and the Defendants informed those who committed each of the instant crimes related to the Mepta (hereinafter “Melopon”) of the information about the persons who committed the instant crimes, thereby cooperating in the criminal investigation.

However, although the Defendants committed each of the instant crimes even though they had had a number of records of each of the instant crimes, they committed again. In particular, Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment on August 14, 2012 with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fence) on August 14, 2012, which was prior to each of the instant crimes, and was during the repeated period after the execution of the sentence was completed on June 12, 2013, even during the repeated period, the Defendants prevented each of the instant crimes, and recommended a female who has no record of the same crime to administer phiphonephones, which led to the administration of phiphones, the number of times of the crimes, and other various circumstances, including the Defendants’ age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized as unfair because the lower court’s punishment imposed on the

3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is without merit and all of them are dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.