logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.04.13 2018고합89
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's right of defense, part of the facts charged was appropriately revised.

On July 28, 2017, the Defendant filed a complaint against the issuance of a summary order of KRW 2 million due to interference with business affairs by the Incheon District Court on November 7, 2017, on the ground that he/she took care of the locker security personnel of his/her home plug in front of the toilet of the 1st floor toilet located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon, for the reason that he/she took care of the locker at the event.

On January 31, 2018, at around 16:00, the Defendant called with the Victim Home Packer Customer Call Center F(35 tax) at the Defendant’s residence located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, and “A fine of two million won has been reported as a obstruction of domestic affairs by interference with domestic affairs, and the Defendant will stop with the Home Packer D without changing the Home Packer president.

C. We now die:

C. It shall be discarded by death.

", 100 persons, 100 persons, 100 persons, with oil prepared for them, now," and "C"

If the death of the G government is why is why we we we see, now, the G government is now in fact, and the G government is now now, however, now now, I n, gasoline at present, and the “I am slick at the time of the slicking of the slick and the slicking of the slick.”

At the same time, the victim threatened the victim for the purpose of retaliation for about 12 minutes while taking the bath that the fine is 2 million won or more.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A written statement;

1. Records of mobile phone conversations A of the victim;

1. Documents, etc. of transfer interference with the relocation of cases;

1. Investigation report (a record recorded by suspect A and Home Plus Customer Center);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the inquiry letter;

1. Article 5-9 (2) and (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution (the grounds for the following sentencing)

arrow