A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

B. On December 4, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for habitual special larceny, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court) on December 4, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence on June 16, 2017 at the detention center in Seoul Eastern District Court.

[Criminal facts]

1. Around 11:50 on July 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) cut off D apartment units 11* 70* 70* 4 of the market price, which is the victim’s low-scale window installed at the victim E’s residence in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, using a cutting machine, which is a dangerous object that has prepared four pre-ceptics for crime prevention.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous things, thereby impairing the utility of the property owned by the victim.

2. On July 23, 2017, at around 11:50, the Defendant: (a) directed the Defendant to steal the property of the residents of the D apartment located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) the said apartment 11* the above apartment d apartment 11* 70* the victim E (V, 29 years old) who was placed in the said apartment d apartment d apartment 11* the above apartment 70* the victim E (V, 29 years old) who was placed in the front of the residence; and (c) cut off by using a strawer prepared in advance 4th of the crime prevention window, which is the victim’s possession installed in the small room window at the said place; and (d) the Defendant’s hair was sealed to the door dive to the door dive of the cut window, and intruded the victim’s residence by putting the two of the Defendant’s

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Investigative reports (to hear statements from victims);

1. Previous convictions: Criminal history inquiry and investigation report (personal confinement status) [The defendant alleged to the effect that the crime of intrusion upon residence is not established because he did not put the two sides of the defendant into the window, but did not put them into the window. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it can be recognized that the defendant was sucked toward a cut window with a view to leaving him out of the window, and even if the defendant merely puts the two windows into the window, the defendant's act is already a crime of intrusion upon residence.