logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원동부지원 2015.03.13 2014가단209151
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's defendant is due to an accident described in the attached Table 2 according to the insurance contract stated in the attached Table 1.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 28, 2008, the Plaintiff concluded an insurance contract with Nonparty B, the Defendant’s mother-friendly Nonparty B, and the Defendant as the insured, and entered into an insurance contract with Non-Distribution B (securities number C) without dividends (securities number D) on July 30, 2009.

B. On December 6, 2010, while the Defendant was engaged in the survey and support duty under F at the construction site of the Highway located at the Busan National University, on December 6, 2010, the Defendant received respectively hospitalized treatment at G Hospital from Busan National University Hospital from December 6, 2010 to April 4, 2011, due to the injury, such as external blood fry, breast-fry, chronicis, chronic fry, dynasium fry, dynasium fry, dynasium fry, dynasium fry, and spine dynasium from April 4, 201 to June 11, 2011.

C. The Defendant demanded that the Plaintiff pay the insurance money of KRW 3,00,000 for the injury medical expenses, KRW 5,400,00 for the day of injury hospitalization, KRW 600,00 for the Alley surgery, KRW 300,00 for the Alley surgery, KRW 600,00 for the Alley diagnosis, KRW 60,00 for the injury after death, and KRW 84,612,529 for the livelihood maintenance fund, KRW 84,612,529 for the injury and death, and KRW 50,00 for the Non-Distribution Fluschip franchise insurance.

At the time of entering into each of the instant insurance policies, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Plaintiff by notifying the Plaintiff of his occupation as a vocational student who fell under class 1 of bodily injury water supply. However, on October 2010, the Defendant joined F and was engaged in surveying auxiliary work, and the above occupation constitutes class 2 of the long-term insurance occupation and risk rating table.

E. Accordingly, the Plaintiff, on July 12, 201, notified the Defendant of the termination of each of the instant insurance contracts by serving a duplicate of the application for conciliation on July 12, 201, on the ground that it is reasonable that the Defendant would reduce part of the Defendant’s claim insurance proceeds and pay KRW 91,956,145,00.

F. The above application for conciliation was filed after the Busan District Court.

arrow