A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 01:30 on April 12, 2017, paid the price, such as the drinking value, before the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 2 Victim C operation; and (b) made it difficult for the Defendant to bring about approximately 40 minutes of the price.

It interfered with the singing of the victimized person by force by complying with the "domination and abusiveing."

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the date, time, and place specified in Paragraph 1, which stated that “the Defendant interfered with the performance of duties by the reception of 112 reports,” was demanded by the assistant F of the Seoul Eastern Police Station Epis affiliated with the Seoul East Police Station Epis to leave the said establishment on the ground that she became aware of the said establishment, and singing the singinger’s drinking and drinking water, and the singer got a slope F’s bridge toward the 112 reported case, thereby interfering with the legitimate performance of official duties by the police officer dealing with the reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of laws and regulations on police statements made to C and F;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution does not have any unfavorable condition, such as the defendant's act of disturbance in another person's place of business under the influence of alcohol, the use of violence to police officers dispatched after receiving 112 a report, the nature and circumstances of crime, and the record of the same kind of crime. However, although there are no unfavorable circumstances such as the defendant's wrong facts, the victim of the obstruction of business does not want the punishment of the defendant, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, criminal records, criminal records, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case