A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 19:10 on September 30, 2016, the Defendant reported 112 at the entrance and exit of the 202 entrance and sent to the scene that the Defendant was going back by the entrance and exit of the 202 entrance and used the Defendant to stop the Defendant’s act while avoiding the Defendant’s act, and assaulted the Defendant’s Babbbbbbbbbbbs of the above D, “if the Defendant was doing so, it would be the crime of obstruction of the performance of the performance of the performance of the performance of the performance of the performance of the duties.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report handling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of D or E;

1. Application of the statutes governing the service place of a police box;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and lecture attendance order, the records of the same crime committed by the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act (two times the suspended sentence), and the contents of the instant crime are disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, in consideration of the fact that there is no particular power after 2010, a punishment to prevent recidivism once again shall be determined.