The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable as the lower court’s punishment (7 million won of a fine) is too unhued.

2. In full view of the circumstances such as the fact that the Defendant was punished as the same crime and the amount of delayed payment is not significant, the Defendant’s escape to China after the prosecution remains for a considerable period after the detention warrant was issued, and the circumstances after the crime are not good, and the Defendant promised to pay the employees with the amount of overdue payment as the cancellation fee for the land for a factory, and the circumstance that the Defendant received the cancellation fee from the I Corporation as scheduled after the Defendant promised to pay the employee with the cancellation fee for the land for a factory, but did not liquidate the overdue payment, it is necessary to warn the Defendant to comply with the corresponding circumstances.

However, the defendant seems to have been in arrears due to the financial difficulties while operating the company, and the defendant's delegated labor affairs consultant J received a provisional attachment decision regarding the defendant's claim of KRW 10 million against K in order to liquidate the overdue wage, the defendant is the most supported by his parent and the wife, and it is necessary to give the defendant an opportunity to pay damages through continuous income while he currently holds the development department of the K in charge of the K in charge of the K in charge of the settlement of the overdue wage. In addition, in light of the fact that substitute payment of KRW 40,167,00 out of the total overdue wage of KRW 68,247,497 was paid to the damaged workers, it is reasonable to see the court below's sentencing of a fine of KRW 7 million.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.