The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court found the Defendant guilty on the ground that there was no fact that the Defendant sold philophones to E.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one year of imprisonment, one million won for additional collection, and one million won for provisional payment) is too heavy.

2. Determination

A. The court below found the following facts based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below's determination of the misconception of facts: (i) E has made a statement at an investigative agency on the process of purchasing a phiphone from the defendant (one name I); (ii) F has credibility with each of the above statements; (iii) E has made a statement on the process of administering a phiphone purchased from the defendant; (iv) E has made a statement at the court below that he was not the defendant; but (iii) it is difficult to believe the above statement in light of the defendant's prosecutor's statement that he purchased the phiphone, and the above investigative agency's statement that he was aware of the fact that he was designated, and (iii) the defendant was arrested and tried to appear at the investigative agency; and (v) the defendant tried to have purchased the phiphone with his statement that he purchased the phiphone from the defendant; and (v) the defendant's assertion that he had sold the phiphone to E, such as the change of the defendant's statement that he purchased the phiphone.

B. The Defendant has no record of punishment for three years since the instant crime was committed.