Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

On June 29, 2013, the Defendants reported the operation of Defendant A’s store to the competent authority and deemed that the victim F was subject to regulation. While there are persons and police officers who are not good for mutual appraisal, Defendant A expressed the victim’s desire to “the year, year, year, year, and year to which the victim was unable to leave,” and Defendant B expressed the victim the victim “A,” and Defendant C expressed the victim “Ara, processed water, protruding the processed matter,” and Defendant C expressed the victim “a fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluen, which is attached to the victim.”

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to insult the victim publicly.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant A and the defendant B

1. Some statements in the police interrogation protocol regarding Defendant C

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning the F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording records;

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment concerning criminal facts: Articles 311 and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;