2018Gohap570 Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud),

Violation of the Act on the Sales, etc. and Regulation of Receiving Goods without Permission

Violation of Korean law

A

Imprising (prosecutions), red strawing (public trial)

Law Firm LLC (LLC)

Attorney Ei-hun, Justice Ei-hun and Justice Park Jae-woo

November 30, 2018

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for seven years.

Criminal facts

【Criminal Power】

On November 2, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Door-to-Door Sales, etc. Act by the Seoul Eastern District Court on November 10, 2006, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 10, 2006, and entered the Republic of Korea on August 30, 2005 with a view to escape from criminal punishment.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant is the actual operator of C Co., Ltd. (formerly named D Co., Ltd.), the multilevel marketing company located in 2-6th floor in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and is the representative director of the above company, F, Vice-Chairperson of the above company, managing director of G, and H, the director of the above company and the affiliate of the above company.

1. A multi-level marketing seller who violates the Door-to-Door Sales, etc. Act shall be prohibited from performing an act of collecting, etc. expenses, money or goods exceeding the level prescribed by the Presidential Decree, which is not more than 10,000 won, from among persons who intend to become multi-level marketing salespersons or multi-level marketing salespersons regardless of their names and forms, such as subscription fees, sales auxiliary goods

Nevertheless, the Defendant, along with E, provided health assistance food, etc. that is merely about 20% of the sales price to a multi-level salesman who is a multi-level salesman who is entitled to receive allowances from the above company, and decided to acquire unjust enrichment in sequence from a person who wishes to become a multi-level salesman by having to become a multi-level salesman after becoming a non-level salesman, by acquiring an amount of money exceeding 40,000 won per person in the name of the principal when he provided health assistance food, etc. which is merely about 20% of the sales price. If the sales price of the company is below after becoming a non-level salesman, he can be paid at least 40,000 won in his name.

Accordingly, the Defendant and E, etc. conspired with each other from November 27, 2004 to August 19, 2005, received 1,237,500 won for the purchase price of goods subject to registration of multi-level marketing salespersons from the victimJ to the above 17 branch offices in the above 17 branch offices and received 1,237,50 won for the purchase price of goods subject to registration of multi-level marketing salespersons in the same manner as shown in the list of crimes in attached Table 15,826 for total 3,878 won for 49,841,21,322 won for total 15,82 won for the purchase price of goods subject to registration of multi-level marketing salespersons, and the multi-level marketing salesperson would be a multi-level marketing salesperson.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Economic Crimes;

In fact, the defendant and E, etc. are 275,00 won as one unit of investment from the victims who are multi-level marketing salespersons of the above enterprise without any investment limit, even if 70% of the investment amount is paid without restriction on the investment limit, they are paid as allowances, the remainder of the investment amount is extremely small, and there is no investment return from profit-making business. 3,00,000 won for 2,750,000 won of the investment principal of the victims, 32,70,000 won for 27,50,000 won for 27,50,000 won for 50,000 won for 223,000,000 won for each victims, and 223,000,500,000 won for 1,000 won for 20,000 won for each victims, and 34,000,000 won for 1,205.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with E, etc. habitually, provided the victims with health assistance food, etc. at the time and place specified in the above paragraph 1.3, at 20% of the total amount of 35% of the investment money, if the victims purchase less than 20% of the total amount of 275,000 won after becoming a salesman, made an investment without any investment limit of 275,000 won, and invested about 40% of the investment money in film production industry, housing rental business, etc. The Defendant continued to receive 32,70,000,000 won exceeding the principal amount of 10,750,000 won and 27,50,000,000 won for 10,000 won for 27,50,500,000 won for 380,000 won for the total amount of 80,000 won for the above investment money from the victims under the above agreement to pay the maximum amount of 30,00,000,00.

3. Violation of the Act on the Regulation of Conducting Fund-Raising Business without Permission.

No person shall engage in a business of receiving investments under an agreement to pay the whole amount of principal or an amount exceeding such amount in the future from many and unspecified persons without obtaining authorization, permission, etc. or making registration, report, etc. under other Acts and subordinate statutes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in collusion with E, etc., agreed to pay an amount exceeding the investment principal to many unspecified persons, such as the victim J, etc. at the time and place specified in the above Paragraph 1 (1) (the date and place specified in the above Paragraph 2). The Defendant, in collusion with E, etc., agreed to receive a total of KRW 60,595,00 from the victims, who are multi-level marketing salespersons of the above company, in the same way under the same manner as the investment deposit in which the purchase price of the goods is the most favorable for the purchase price of the goods from the victims who are multi-level marketing salespersons of the above company, including the receipt of KRW 60,595,00 under the pretext of the investment deposit in the list of crimes in the attached Table 15,826. The summary of the evidence was as follows.

1. Partial statement of each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the defendant against the defendant;

1. The suspect examination protocol of K by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement of L, J, M, N,O, P, Q, R, and S;

1. Investigation report (No. 1 of the investigation records, No. 159-161 of the investigation records), investigation report (No. 327-341 of the suspect A's mail records, a copy of the investigation records, No. 327-341 of the investigation records), investigation report (No. 1 of the investigation records, No. 342-409 of the investigation records), investigation report (No. 1 of the interrogation records of the F prosecutor's office in relation to the suspect A) (No. 430-445 of the investigation records, a copy of the interrogation records of the prosecutor's office in relation to the suspect A), investigation report (No. 1 of the investigation records, No. 1 of the investigation records, No. 446-464 of the investigation records, a copy of the interrogation records of G prosecutor's suspect interrogation records in relation to the suspect A), investigation report (No. 1 of the investigation records, No. 465-491 of the investigation records, and a copy of the investigation report)

1. The investigation report (the third trial records attached to this case, E, F, G, H, H, K, U, and V, the third trial records attached to the Seoul Eastern District Court, the first right 524-566 of the investigation records, the investigation report (the second trial records attached to this case E, F, G, H, witness W, and U), the second trial records attached to the Seoul High Court for the suspect E, F, H, H, witness W, and U, the first right 567-603 pages of the investigation records, the second page of the record attached to the investigation records, the second page of the record attached to the investigation records, the second page of the record attached to the case, the third page of the records of the investigation (the third page of the investigation records), the D compensation franchise (the third page of the investigation records attached to the accounting records, the fourth right 92,93 pages of the investigation records), the investigation report (the fourth right 994-998 pages of

1. Records before judgment: Criminal records and other inquiry reports;

1. Habituality of judgment: The recognition of dampness in light of the records of each crime, the method and frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crime has been committed in a planned and organized manner;

Application of Statutes

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

Article 3 (1) 1 of the former Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (wholly amended by Act No. 11304, Feb. 10, 2012); Articles 351, 347 (1), and 30 of the Criminal Act (wholly amended by Act No. 11304, Feb. 10; hereinafter the same shall apply); Articles 42 (1) 2 and 23 (1) 3 of the former Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (wholly amended by Act No. 11324, Feb. 17, 2012; hereinafter the same shall apply); Articles 351, 347 (1), and 30 of the Criminal Act; hereinafter the same shall apply); Articles 6 (1) and 30 of the Act on the Regulation of Unauthorized Sales Act; hereinafter the same shall apply); and Article 42 of the former Criminal Act (wholly amended by multilevel salesman; hereinafter the same shall apply);

1. Handling concurrent crimes;

The latter part of Article 37 and the first part of Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act (trade between the crimes and the violation of the Door-to-Door Sales, etc. Act, which became final and conclusive on November 10, 2006 of the column of criminal power

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

Judgment on the assertion of the defendant and defense counsel in the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act / [Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud)]

1. Summary of the assertion

The Defendant provided, upon the request of E, etc., advice about the operation of the C Co., Ltd. (formerly: D Co., Ltd.; hereinafter referred to as the “instant Co., Ltd.”) or gave lectures twice or more. However, the Defendant is not the founder or the actual operator of the instant Co., Ltd., but there is no conspiracy to commit each of the instant crimes with E, etc. or any sharing of the commission of the instant acts.

2. Determination

(a) Facts of recognition;

According to the above evidence, the following facts are acknowledged.

1) At the time of the incorporation of the instant company, the Defendant provided a compensation franchise (PLC compensation franchise, FLC compensation franchise) to E, etc. (No. 69, 70, 71, 72, 95-131, 321, 414, 321, 414, 489 of investigation records, and 489 of investigation records).

2) The Defendant was provided with a corporate card from the instant company and used it, and the recipient column of the “corporation card delivery recipient” prepared and kept by the instant company is indicated as the Defendant’s “pintin” (No. 1st, 79, 156, 321, 421, 740, 746). (3) The Defendant was called the instant company as the “pintin” from the instant company, and was present at the president’s conference as the “pintin.” On June 2005, the Defendant was demoted twice against the members of the instant company, and was paid KRW 20 million in total (No. 1st, 321, 324, 420, 416, 489).

4) The e-mail sent by the Defendant to E, etc. in relation to the operation, etc. of the instant company includes the following (Article 1, 328-336, 339 of the Investigation Records).

On April 23, 2005, 5 should be carried out five, and 230,000 won per capita. It is necessary that all of them hold a security guard. Whether they enter the X-Chairperson or not or not, and if you indicate that it is clear on the current business conditions, it is necessary to reflect on the atmosphere of the president. It is necessary to 0: 5,000 p.m. No more than 0,000 p.m. 5,000 p.m. ; 5,000 p.m. ; 5,000 p.m. ; 5,000 p.m. ; 5,000 p.m. ; 5,000 p.m. ; 5,000 p.m. ; 5,000 p.m. ; 5,000 p.m. ; 5,000 p.m., more than 5,000>

- The head of the branch office has a lot of problems on the scale of the business owner, so it is necessary to give 0 p.m. to respond to 00 times, and to keep this sound. It is difficult to do so.- Unfriendly theory on female employees of the branch office. - It is necessary to create a corporation as soon as it is unclear and adjust the corporate governance of Korea, the Philippines and the United States, and set up a group's vision.-First of all, it is necessary to use AB Bank ABC AD with funds to establish a corporation, and it is expected that 00,000 won will take place, such as attracting corporate loans, adjustment of shares, and so on. 0,000 won will be sent at least 0,000 won to 0,000 won, and 1,000,000,000 won will not be paid to A-O-O-O-O's new funds will be deferred and will not be paid to 1,000,0000 won.

대금(교환권)을 지급할 때 물대에서 10%(D 마진분) 정도만 붙여서 지급하고 D 직원 급여, 임대료, I 운영에 관한 비용, 경비, 물건 사입대금 결제 및 방법 부분을 떼어서 해보라고 주시고 시켜보시면 됩니다.- I는 모델로 우리가 구성을 한 것이고 또한 운영시스템을 만들기 위해서 우리가 직영하는 것입니다.- 마산은 2호점인 만큼 우리가 큰 자금을 들일 필요는 없으며 인테리어나 하는 부분들은 크게 할부분이 없고 일단 층별 운영계획을 잡으시고 층별에 맞게 원상복구를 생각해서 사무실은 그저사무실 정도로 진행하시되 강의실도 별도로 있고 그림 플라자가 문제인데 각 층에 입점할 아이템을 선정하고 서울에 입점된 업체 포함입니다. 입점구역을 정해준 다음 인테리어 비용/임대료/제품 등을 부담하여 입주토록 하면 우리가 재고나 자금을 먼저 투여할 이유는 없습니다.- 서울D도 더 이상의 명품 사입은 지양하고 명품관 코너 분양 형태를 취해 적극적으로 명품 사업자들을 찾으세요.- 이때 E 대표께서 모든 입점주들과 미팅을 하시고 관상을 보시되 모가 나 있는 관상이나 정겹지않은 관상은 멀리하세요. 또한 조금이라도 건달깡패끼가 있는 놈들은 절대로 들이지 마세요. 가능하면 여자로 고르되 너무 잘난 척하는 여자들을 조심하세요. 주민등록등본을 받아서 반드시신원조회를 해보세요.- 든든합니다. 회장단 사무실은 X부/Y 부|대표이사/임원/전산/회계/상품기획 등이 옮길 수 있도록하시고 세계 본부는 별도로 법인 설립하여 구성토록 할 것이니 너무 신경 쓰지 마세요.O 2005. 5. 26.- 제목 : 들려오는 되지도 안한 말들 / 사실 파악하여 한 줄씩 답변 부탁함,- 다음은 그동안 제가 나름대로 미국사업을 준비하면서 몇몇 D사업자들과의 의견수렴과 관찰을통해 얻은 작금의 한국D 상황인식입니다. 가감 없이 전달하니 참고하시기 바랍니다.- 회장님께서도 한국에서의 사업시그널을 잘 살펴보셔야 하겠습니다. E 대표의 원리원칙 경영방침이 사업자들과 충돌을 일으키고 있어 보입니다. 좀 더 공격적이고 융통성 있는 경영이 필요할듯합니다. 아직은 좀 더 리더사업자들의 의견을 참고하고, 가려운 곳을 긁어주면서 가야하고, 신

I would like to proceed in a flexible manner without alternatives and strategies. It seems that all these problems will lead to only a low management system. While the Chairperson is able to solve these problems, I will also endeavor to prepare for the U.S. business, and I would like to actively cope with it. I will see that I would like to do more active from a more active point of view.O on May 30, 2005-O on May 30, 2005, I would like to have purchased AH president's office from AH. At the time, I would like to think that I would like to purchase I would like to help. But I would like to spite, I would like to be responsible for the future, but I would have to pay 00 million won in the future, and I would like to pay 100 billion won in the aggregate, and 100 billion won in the future.

5) In addition, the e-mail sent by the library of the instant company assisting the Defendant includes the following (No. 1st right 337, 338, 340 pages).

O. 25 May 25, 2005 - He shall pay attention to the direction of the President - He shall refer to his work to the direction of the President - he shall pay attention to the implementation of the direction . - he shall do so so as to know how well he will progress with respect to the progress so far after the second session of May 7. - he shall report the situation . - At present, the planning portion of the goods will be more important than what he begins to take off, but it will be more than 0. 6. 5. 6. 5. 6. 6. 5. 6. 5. 6. 6. 5. 6. 6. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 2. 1. 1. 1. 3. 3. 1, 1. 2. 1. 1. 1. . 1. 1. . 1. . 1. 1. 1. . . . 1. 1. . . 1. . 1. . . . . . . . . 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

B. Relevant legal principles

In order to constitute a joint principal offender, it is necessary to implement a crime through a functional control based on the joint principal’s intent as a subjective element. Here, the intent of joint process is insufficient to recognize another person’s criminal act and to accept it without restraint. The purport of joint process is to move one another’s criminal act to one another’s criminal act by using another’s criminal act as a joint principal offender. A joint principal offender may be held liable even for a person who does not directly share part of the elements of a crime and perform it. However, in light of the status and role of the principal in the whole crime, control or malicious power over the progress of the crime, it should not be deemed that there exists a mere conspiracy, but a functional control over the crime through an essential contribution to the crime (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2005Do3352, Jul. 22, 2005).

C. Specific determination

Examining the instant case in light of the relevant legal principles, it is reasonable to view that the Defendant, as the founder and the actual operator of the instant company, conspired to commit each of the instant crimes with E, etc. and shared the act of committing the instant crimes in full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence as seen earlier.

1) The Defendant made a statement to E, etc. that only gave advice or advice on the operation of the instant company. However, considering not only the content of the e-mail as seen earlier, that is, the Defendant received from time to time reports on the operational status of the instant company, but also specific instructions and approvals on the company policy, business direction, organization structure, personnel affairs, benefits, and fund execution, and the Defendant was paid benefits and incentives from the instant company, the Defendant appears to be the founder of the instant company and the actual operator, and the following related persons’ statements are added thereto.

2) The president of the company of this case is the president of the company of this case. The company of this case is to memory as the defendant, E, and F. The company of this case was directly consulted upon the operation of I (affiliated company of this case) by the defendant, and the defendant is aware that the defendant was the foundation of the company of this case." The defendant is not the defendant, who was living in the Philippines and did not enter the Republic of Korea." The president meeting of this case was held three times from May 1, 2005 to that of the company of this case, and there was no discussion about the operation status or operation plan of the company of this case. The defendant's 2nd executive officer of this case was the defendant's company of this case's second executive officer of the company of this case's second executive officer of the company of this case. The defendant's 2nd executive officer of the company of this case's second executive officer officer of this case's second executive officer officer of the company of this case's second executive officer officer meeting of this case'.

3) 또한, 관련 사건(서울동부지방법원 2005고합275 사건)의 수사과정에서 F, E, G, H은 일치하여 '피고인이 2004. 10.경 이 사건 회사를 설립하면서 저(F)에게 대표이사를 맡아달라고 하여 제가 대표이사직을 맡아 근무하였는데 2005. 1.말경부터는 피고인이 사실상 대표이사로서 회사 운영을 직접 하였다.', '피고인이 2004. 10.경 AN를 탈퇴한 후 동일한 마케팅플랜을 활용하여 영업을 하는 이 사건 회사를 만들겠다고 하면서 E이 이에 동참하게 된 것이다.', '회장은 설립자인 피고인이었고, 피고인이 회사 운영을 총괄하고 회사 설립과 마케팅플랜을 결정하였다.', '피고인이 설립자 겸 회장으로서 회사 설립과 운영을 총괄한 실세이자 1인자이다.', '피고인의 지시를 받아 회사 운영을 총괄하였 다.', '이 사건 피해는 도주한 피고인이 모두 총괄하였다.', '저희들(F, E, G, H)은 피고인의 지시를 받아 일을 하면서 이 사건 잘못을 저지른 것이다.', '피고인은 이 사건 회사로부터 월 1,000만 원의 급여를 받았고, 2,000만 원(후에 500만 원으로 감액) 한도의 법인카드와 차량을 제공받아 사용하였다.'라는 취지로 각 진술하였다(수사기록 제1권 435, 436, 441, 442, 452-454, 473, 477, 482, 488, 412, 71|47 490, 543, 550, 739, 740%). 4) E은 관련 사건의 제1심 공판과정에서 '중요한 자금집행은 피고인이 재정국장인 AF이나 경리부장인 AO에게 직접 전화 등으로 지시하여 실행하였다.', '피고인은 저(E)를 비롯한 모든 임직원들에게 자신이 직접 또는 비서실을 통하여 이메일, 휴대폰 통화, 휴대폰 문자메시지 등 다양한 방법으로 직접 지시를 내렸다.', '피고인으로부터 제(E) 명의로 법인 설립을 하라는 지시가 있었다.', '피고인은 AN 사건으로 수사가 진행되자 2005. 2. 중순경 필리핀으로 도망간 후, 2005. 6. 10.경 재입국할 때까지 필리핀에서 모든 업무지시를 하였다.', '모든 계열사의 이사급 이상 임원에 대한 임면권은 물론, 급여, 운행차량의 등급 및 법인카드의 한도액 설정 등에 관한 권한은 일체 피고인이 장악하고 있었다.', '피고인은 자신의 비서실을 주) AJ(이하 'AJ'라 한다)로 법인화하여 이를 통하여 모든 계열사 및 그 임직원들을 지배하였다.', '피고인은 사소한 금액에 대하여도 저(E)를 거치지 않고 경리부로부터 직접 보고를 받았다.', '피고인이 직접 이 사건 회사 부회장단의 급여, 법인카드 한도액을 설정하였다.', '피고인이 필리핀이라는 먼 곳에 떨어져 있기 때문에 회사 소속 직원들로부터 거리감이 생길 것을 염려하여 매주 월요일마다 피고인이 직접 직원들에게 메일을 보냈는데, 그 범위는 내용에 따라서 전 직원에게 보내는 이메일과 전 임원들에게 보내는 이메일로 구분되었다.', '비서실이 필리핀으로 가면서부터 전화 또는 이메일로 연락이 왔고 저희가 필리핀 쪽으로 직접 연락을 하면 비서실에서, 중간에 전화를 차단하여 간접적으로 연락하는 방식을 취하였다.', '전 그룹사 임직원의 개인별 인사기록부를 필리핀으로 보내 비서실에서 인사기록 자체를 관장하면서 보직 발령 등에 활용하였다.', '일부 탑리더의 경우에는 피고인과 직접적으로 관련된 사람으로서 피고인에게 바로 이메일을 보내기도 하였다.'는 취지로 진술하였다(수사기록 제1권 528-537쪽).

5) 관련 사건의 제1심 공판과정에서, 이 사건 회사의 직원이었던 U은 '피고인은 일산에 오피스텔을 얻어 이 사건 회사의 설립에 필요한 준비를 하면서 저(U)와 AP, AQ 등을 끌어들여 사업준비를 하도록 하였고, 피고인과 AN의 간부로 있던 AG이 이 작업을 지휘하였다.', '이 사건 회사가 설립되면서 피고인은 자신이 직접 전면에 나설 수 없어 F을 사장으로 영입하였다.', '이 사건 회사의 설립 준비과정에서 피고인의 직접 지시에 따라 모든 업무가 수행되었다.', 'E은 피고인의 지시에 따라 필리핀으로 출국하였다가 국내에서 이 사건 회사의 설립준비가 진행되면서 그 업무에 필요한 인원이 부족하자 피고인은 E을 다시 국내로 불러 이 사건 회사의 설립준비작업을 도우라고 지시하였고, 이에 따라 E은 국내로 들어와 저(U)와 AP, AQ 등과 함께 이 사건 회사의 설립작업을 진행하게 되었다.', '피고인이 벌인 여러 사업은 각 사업마다 실무담당자가 정하여져 있어 피고인이 실무담당자에게 중요한 사항을 직접 지시하였다.', '그 실무담 당자들은 E이나 F과의 관계에서 이들의 지시를 받는 것이 아니라 독립된 지위에서 자신들의 고유 업무를 피고인의 지시에 따라 수행하였다.', '피고인이 필리핀에 체류 중인 동안에는 전화 통화나 이메일을 통하여 실무담당자에게 직접 지시를 내리거나 기획조 정실 기능을 갖는 회사 내의 조직인 AR의 직원들을 통하여 지시를 내렸다.', 'AJ는 피고인의 지시를 받아 이 사건 회사가 벌이는 제반 투자사업을 관장하였고, E, F은 AJ의 설립이나 활동에 전혀 개입하거나 관여하지 않았으며, AJ의 직원들은 피고인의 지휘 아래 업무를 수행하였다.', '일에 대한 결정은 피고인이 다 한 것으로 알고 있다.', '계열사 운영은 피고인이 직접 계열사 책임자에게 지시하거나 AJ를 통하여 명령을 하달하는 방법으로 하였다.', 'AJ의 직원들은 피고인으로부터 직접 명령을 받아 업무를 수행하였고, 피고인이 필리핀에 가 있는 동안에도 AJ의 직원들이 필리핀에서 피고인과 숙식을 같이 하면서 피고인을 보좌하였다.', 'AJ의 직원들은 수시로 한국을 드나들면서 피고인의 지시사항을 계열사에 하달하였다.', '이 사건 회사의 자금관리 및 회계는 피고인이 AF, AS 등에게 직접 명령을 내려 이를 관리하였다.', '피고인이 설립한 계열사의 임원 및 피고인과 직접적인 관계를 맺고 있는 계열사 임직원들은 필리핀에 모여서 업무현황을 보고하는 등 1박 2일 기준으로 2~3회 회의를 하였다.', '피고인은 리더 사업자에 대한 관리 활동의 일환으로 필리핀 초청세미나를 개최한 적이 있다.', '이 사건 회사의 수당지급시스템은 피고인이 결정한 것으로 알고 있다.', '피고인이 전면에 나서지 않은 이유는 당시 이 사건 회사와 AN가 경쟁관계에 있었기 때문에 전면에 나서면 해코지가 있을 것 같아 나서지 못한 것으로 알고 있다.'라는 취지로(수사기록 제1권 538~549쪽), 이 사건 회사의 직원이었던 K는 '이 사건 회사는 피고인이 일산에 개인 사무실을 내어 회사설립기획단을 발족하면서 설립준비가 시작되었다.', '이 사건 회사는 피고인의 지시로 AM라는 기존 다단계회사를 인수한 후 그 상호를 변경하여 설립된 것으로 알고 있다.', '이 사건 회사는 2004. 11. 20.경부터 영업을 시작하였는데, 당시 다단계판매원조 직의 상당 부분은 피고인에 의하여 이미 구축되어 있었다.', '피고인은 이 사건 회사의 창업 초기부터 자신과 함께 일을 하였던 상위 판매원들을 3박 4일 또는 2박 3일 일정으로 필리핀으로 초청한 사실이 있다.'라는 취지로(수사기록 제1권 551~555쪽), AJ의 직원이었던 V은 'AJ에서 근무할 당시 피고인이 지시하는 업무들을 계열사나 임원들에게 전달하는 역할을 하였다.', '피고인이 AN 사건에 연루되어 있었기 때문에 한국에서의 활동이 용이하지 않아 필리핀에서 생활하였고, 그곳에서 업무를 직접 지시하고 전달하기 위하여 필리핀에서 3회 정도 사장단회의를 한 것으로 기억한다.', '이 사건 회사의 부회장단은 신규사업이나 회사정책 등에 관하여 피고인에 대한 자문 역할을 주로 하였다.', '피고인은 회계팀에 송금지시를 함에 있어 직접 전화를 하거나 비서실 직원을 통하여 어떤 통장에 송금하라는 식으로 지시를 하여 업무를 처리하였다.', '피고인이 회사 자금을 필리핀으로 반출하는 방법으로 필리핀에서 소집된 사장단회의 때 한사람 당얼마씩 가져오라고 지시한 적도 있다.', '피고인은 전산망을 통하여 직접 실시간으로 일일매출현황을 확인하였다.', '피고인의 필리핀 사무실에는 전산망을 볼 수 있는 프로그램이 설치된 컴퓨터가 있었고, 이 사건 회사를 볼 수 있는 CCTV가 15대, 계열사인 I를 볼 수 있는 CCTV가 9대 정도 설치되어있어 회사 현황이나 매출 현황을 볼 수 있었다.', '피고인이 E 등에게 지시하면서 "회사가 어려워지면 내가 돈을 끌고 오지 누가 만들어 오냐.", "모든 책임은 내가 진다."라고 말하는 것을 여러 차례 듣거나 목격한 적이 있다.', '수당을 나누어 주는 부분에 대해서는 피고인이 직접 금액을 지시하고 대표이사는 전산상으로 나와 있는 금액을 보고 결재하는 것이다.'라는 취지로(수사기록 제1권 557~565쪽) 각 진술하였다.

6) During the appellate trial of the relevant case, W, who was the representative director of the business partner of the instant company, had been thought to separately pay a new phase company due to conflict with W, but this fact was committed in secret so as not to be known on the side of AT." In fact, the instant company was actually established by the Defendant, but in particular, F, who had no experience in managing the multi-level company and no relationship with N, was appointed as the representative director. (No. 1 right of investigation record No. 587-593). The LU, who was the business partner of the instant company, made a new phase company around November 2004, requested the victims to the effect that the Defendant would assist him to make a new phase company, and the Defendant made a statement to the effect that "the Defendant would have become the vice president of the instant company," "the representative director of the instant company," and "the Defendant would be responsible for all of the instant investigation records," and "the Defendant made a statement to the effect that all of the instant companies would be the 5th president or 6)".

1. Reasons for sentencing: Imprisonment with prison labor for a period from five years to 22 months;

2. Application of the sentencing criteria;

(a) Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes;

[Determination of Punishment] 30 billion won or more (Type 5) as a systematic fraud

[Special Person] When he plans or directs the implementation of the act of fraud, where he/she commits a crime against unspecified or large number of victims or repeatedly commits a crime for a considerable period of time, where he/she causes serious damage to the victim.

[Recommendation Area and Scope of Recommendations] Special Priority Area, Imprisonment for not less than 11 years or imprisonment for life

* descriptive criteria: 2-stage increase in type as a result of summing-up of the same competition (the lowest sentence 1/2 shall be mitigated)

(b) Violating the Act on Door-to-Door Sales, etc. and the Act on the Regulation of Conducting Fund-Raising without Permission: The sentencing standards are not set

(c) The standards for handling multiple crimes: Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than five years and six months (the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) for which the sentencing criteria are set, each violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Door-to-Door Sales, etc., for which no sentencing guidelines are set, and the violation of the Act on the Regulation of Unauthorized

3. Determination of sentence: The crime of this case for seven years is committed by the Defendant with E, etc. by acquiring goods of the lower price sold by the instant company at least a certain amount, and if a member is eligible to receive high-rate allowances according to the sales performance posted by the lower members, and by establishing and operating a multi-level marketing organization without registration, thereby committing an act of receiving money without registration. The crime of this case for a considerable period of time is not likely to be committed by the Defendant, considering the degree of the Defendant’s participation, the period of the crime, the method of the crime, the number of damages, etc., the nature of the crime is bad, and the members are likely to attract their families, relatives, ties, etc. around the instant company to new members. To increase sales, the social damage caused by continuing a long-term crime with the nation-wide organization. Nevertheless, considering the fact that the Defendant was merely aware that he provided advice or advice on the operation of the instant company, and all accomplices are inevitable for a considerable period of time after the crime of this case was committed for a considerable period of time.

However, it cannot be denied that some of the purchase cost or investment amount of the goods appears to have been returned to the victims, the victims who seem to have invested for the purpose of obtaining high profits in a short period are liable for the occurrence and expansion of the damage in this case, and other factors of sentencing in this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and method of crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered by the order.

The presiding judge, the Kim Jong-dong

Judge Political decoration

Judge Lee Sang-hoon