Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant brought a dispute with the victim D as a matter of traffic accident agreement on the wind that caused the traffic accident while the Defendant, who is the Defendant’s son, was running in the “F” restaurant operated by the victim D, and the victim D was accused of interfering with the restaurant business and impairing honor on November 22, 2014.

이에 피해자 D가 시비가 발생할 것을 우려하여 피고인에게 ‘그냥 나가세요’라며 수회에 걸쳐 나갈 것을 요구하였음에도 피고인은 이에 응하지 않은 채 버티면서 피해자 D의 몸을 손바닥으로 수회 밀치고, 피해자 D이 피고인을 식당 밖으로 데리고 나가자 손으로 피해자 D의 뺨을 때리고, 피해자 D의 처인 피해자 G이 이를 만류하자 손으로 피해자 G의 목 부위를 밀치고 발로 피해자 G의 다리를 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim D's restaurant business by force by avoiding the disturbance without leaving the above restaurant, despite the victim D's request, and allowing customers in the above restaurant out of the restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of D;

1. Statement of the police statement of G, H and I;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that a fine for a summary order shall be reduced in consideration of the fact that the defendant's mistake was caused by the sentencing reason of the provisional payment order, and the victims do not want the punishment of the defendant. However, in previous cases, a fine of KRW 70,000 shall be imposed in consideration of the fact that the victim interfered with the victim's work and had a record of being sentenced to a fine of KRW 50,000 by interfering