All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the judgment of the court below against the summary of the grounds for appeal (a punishment of one year and six months, and an order to complete a sexual assault treatment program 120 hours) is too large and the amount of the punishment is unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the amount of the punishment is too unfeasible and thus the amount of the punishment is unreasonable.

2. The sentencing conditions have no particular change compared to those of the lower court because a new sentencing data was not submitted in the appellate court’s judgment.

In full view of all the sentencing factors revealed at the trial of this case, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy to the extent that it exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion of the court, and it does not seem that it is too light.

Therefore, each argument of the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. The appeal filed by the Defendant and the prosecutor in conclusion is without merit, and all of them are dismissed.