The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., 10 months of imprisonment) of the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is too late, and there are circumstances in which part of the damaged goods have been returned to the victim.

However, the Defendant had a history of having been punished several times for the same type of crime, although one year has not passed since the Defendant was sentenced to punishment for the same kind of crime, and thus repeatedly committed the same kind of crime, the method of crime appears to be planned and specialized, and there is no particular change in sentencing conditions compared with the original judgment, as the new sentencing data was not submitted in the trial after the lower court was sentenced, and other factors of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct and environment, motive for the crime, and circumstances after the crime, are considered comprehensively, it does not seem that the lower court’s punishment is too heavy.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.