logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.11.09 2016고정1593
화재예방,소방시설설치ㆍ유지및안전관리에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of a building that actually owns and manages the building in Daegu Jung-gu.

The above building is the building permit date (the date of December 24, 1982), the approval date of use (the date of November 4, 1983), and the fire prevention and the installation, maintenance, and safety control of fire-fighting systems under Article 25 of the Act on Fire Prevention and Installation, Maintenance, and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting Systems, and conducted an inspection as a specific fire-fighting object subject to comprehensive precision inspection under

As a result of the self-inspection of the above building, the Defendant did not take any measure by the deadline for the order to take measures (the second: February 3, 2016) and the deadline for the second measure (the second: March 26, 2016) against the object of nonconformity (the third: April 7, 2016), and did not repair only some fire-fighting systems (the escape equipment) by the deadline for the second measure (the third: April 10, 2016) (the third: May 10, 2016). The Defendant did not repair the warning equipment (the automatic fire detection equipment), the fire extinguishing equipment (the indoor fire hydrant, the head of the fire extinguishing equipment) and the head of the fire station violated the order to take measures without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the results of a comprehensive precise inspection of fire-fighting systems in 2015, such as a detailed statement as a result of the inspection, whether to repair the current status, a report on each fire-fighting-related statute violations (1 and 2), an order to take measures inappropriate as a result of a joint inspection of C

1. Article 48-2 and subparagraph 1 of Article 48-2 and Article 9 (2) of the Act on the Installation, Maintenance, and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting Systems concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow