logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.11.08 2017고단2191
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that it does not harm the identity of the facts charged and the defendant's right to defense, part of the facts charged was revised and stated in accordance with evidence.

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On October 6, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes in the Seoul Eastern District Court (Kameras et al.) and completed the execution of the sentence in the Seoul Eastern District Court on March 27, 2017.

【Criminal Facts of Crimes】 On June 6, 2017, the Defendant posted an article that “I sell doping 7 in so far as gallon jums are sold” on the Internet B car page, and false statement was made to the victim C who reported and contacted the article.”

However, even if the defendant did not have the above portable phone and received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the mobile phone to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, received KRW 290,00 from the victim to the corporate bank account (D) in the name of the Defendant, and received KRW 290,000 from the victim, and acquired KRW 987,50 in total from the victims through the above method as shown in the crime list, from July 13, 2017.

"2017 Highest 2392"

1. From June 11, 2017 to 05:51 to 06:03, the Defendant stolen cash amounting to 670,000 won in the Defendant’s credit cooperative using the gaps in which the victim F was negligent in monitoring the victim while working in the “G convenience store” operated by the victim F in the Seoul Jung-gu E and the first floor.

2. Fraud;

A. On July 7, 2017, the Defendant posted a notice stating that “I will sell the mwem 16 complete implements” at the Internet site “H at the site of the Internet site,” and falsely stated that “I will send the goods to the victim I who contacted with the notice.”

However, the defendant does not have the above perfectness.

arrow