Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Criminal facts

D is the representative director of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City E, and the above company is a similar receiver who has received investment money from victims under the pretext that it can receive 800-1300% of the purchase amount of insurance from life insurance companies after entering into an insurance contract with various domestic life insurance companies and soliciting customers, and then receive 80-1300% of the purchase amount of insurance from life insurance companies.

1. No person who violates the Act on the Regulation of Conducting Fund-Raising Business without obtaining authorization or permission under Acts and subordinate statutes, or without making registration or report, etc., shall receive contributions under an agreement from many and unspecified persons for payment of the total amount of contributions or an amount in excess thereof;

Nevertheless, Defendant A and Defendant B received the amount of KRW 10 million from D to pay KRW 500,000 per month the amount of KRW 500,000 per month, and tried to receive the investment amount from the victims.

At around 16:30 on April 4, 201, at the office of Jung-gu, Daegu, 201, the Defendants agreed to the effect that “if the Defendants invest KRW 10,000,000 in the investment business in Seoul, Co., Ltd. E in connection with insurance, they may receive dividends in an amount of KRW 1,50,000 per week from the date of investment, for every eight weeks from the date of investment,” and imported KRW 30,000 from the victim G for six times from three victims as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

2. The Defendants in collusion with each other do not have the intent or ability to pay dividends to the victims by engaging in an investment business in relation to the insurance at the time, place, etc. as stated in paragraph (1). However, it is false that even if a new investor continued to attract and receive the dividends, the Defendants may continue to pay the dividends at a certain rate even if they could receive the dividends.