logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.06.25 2015고단133
도박
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, along with D, E, and F on September 30, 201, from around 23:00 to October 01:30, 201, up to 7:1:00, the Defendants, within the “I Party” operated by H, the seat of the Defendants in Ulsan-gu G, Ulsan-gu, by means of 52 card, set as 1, etc., each of the following persons who first remove the card in accordance with the prescribed handling; and 2, 1,000 won, 3, etc., 3,00 won, 3,00 won, and 4, etc., with the total sum of 7.1 million won, and 7,000 won, and 3,000 won, 3,000 won, and 7.1,000 won, and 3,000 won, hereinafter referred to as “hulule” through several times:

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. An interrogation protocol of F by prosecution;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of investigation reports (Evidence records 67 pages) and photographs, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Listening to the E telephone statement);

1. Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act for forfeiture;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Articles 186(1) and 187 of the Criminal Procedure Act, which bear the costs of lawsuit, denied the crimes since the investigation agency and the court, and Defendant A was punished once by a fine for gambling, and Defendant B was punished three times by a crime of gambling and habitual gambling, and Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in six months of imprisonment with prison labor due to a crime of habitual gambling, and each of them was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in six months of imprisonment with prison labor, taking into account favorable circumstances that are favorable to the fact that all the Defendants of the last and the last, recognized the mistake of all the Defendants and the time of the crime.

arrow