logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.09.14 2017구합82512
교섭요구 사실의 공고에 대한 시정 재심결정취소 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

I. Details and details of the retrial ruling;

A. On May 24, 200, the Plaintiff established a Dong-dong Agency Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) (hereinafter “instant agency”) (hereinafter “instant agency”) and runs the automobile sales business until now.

D On July 1, 2005, after entering into a car sales service contract with the Plaintiff, the car masters “car masters” in the instant agency refers to the car masters who enter into a car sales service contract with the automobile sales agent owner (hereinafter referred to as the “agency owner”) and perform the duties of automobile sales, collection, claims management, etc.

The plaintiff and the defendant trade the name of "car masters", and thus, the plaintiff and the defendant are also referred to as "car masters" to the automobile sales agents.

shall have served as such.

B. The intervenor is a national-level trade union whose target is the car masters serving at the car sales agencies nationwide.

On September 18, 2015, the intervenor received a trade union establishment report from the Seoul Regional Employment and Labor Agency on September 18, 2015.

D was admitted to the Intervenor in October 2015.

C. On July 18, 2017, the Intervenor requested the Plaintiff to publish the demand for bargaining and bargaining in writing, based on Article 14-2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act (hereinafter “Trade Union Act”) and Article 14-2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act (hereinafter “Enforcement Decree of the Trade Union Act”).

In accordance with Articles 29 and 30 of the Trade Union Act and the Enforcement Decree of the Trade Union Act, the Intervenor shall hold a general meeting on August 22, 2015, and shall receive a certificate of completion of report from the Ministry of Employment and Labor on September 18, 2015.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff, the employer, immediately after the receipt of the official document, shall be given the notice of the request for bargaining in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations.

- - Future - Trade Union names: the names of the intervenors - Representatives.

arrow