All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

As to the judgment of the court below, the defendant appealed on the ground that the punishment sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable (eight months of imprisonment), and the prosecutor appealed on the ground that the sentence of the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

Although there are many records of punishment for fraud and embezzlement, the above previous records are all criminal records prior to 2012, and the amount and fraud method of money obtained by the defendant from victims, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too heavy or unreasonable.

Therefore, since the appeal of this case by the defendant and the prosecutor is groundless, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.