The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) was that the Defendant operated a motor vehicle with the consent of the victim that it would be better for the victim to use the motor vehicle.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, the victim’s use of the vehicle owned by the victim without the consent of the victim, taking into account the following circumstances, including: (a) the Defendant consistently stated that the victim driven the vehicle from the police to the court of the lower court without the consent of the victim; and (b) the GDo alleged that the Defendant was at the time of obtaining the consent from the victim; and (c) the Defendant stated that the Defendant did not consistently talk about the victim to use the vehicle from the police to this court;

The defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.