logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.10.30 2014고단68 (1)
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by a fine of 5,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

D The employer (E) and the owners of the national housing (type 85 square meters or less of exclusive housing) that will lend the name of the business operator (E) and the lessor (type 85 square meters or less of exclusive housing) as if they had a work place due to the absence of a certain occupation or income, conspired with them to recruit people who are not easy to lend a financial institution due to the absence of a certain occupation or income, and in collusion with them to have a work place by using a false certificate of employment and a lease contract, and to have the victim's "workers' and ordinary people's housing rent fund" financed by the National Housing Fund as if there

E would receive KRW 3,00,000 per case from the above D as a person who operated the “G” in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City F, and then registered the loan applicants designated by Dong as an employee of the above company, issued a false certificate of employment, etc., and issued a false certificate of employment at the bank later, the bank plays a role of responding as if the bank is an actual employee in connection with the payment review of loans.

Pursuant to the above public offering, the Defendants and the above D applied for a loan of KRW 49,00,000 for a loan from Defendant A to Defendant B’s bank account on the same day from the victim, after making a false lease contract (a lease: B, lessee: Ha, Mapopo City H, Mapo-si: Mapo-si: Mapo-si: Mapo-si) under the name of the lessor from Defendant B, and then Defendant A applied for a loan of KRW 49,00,000 for a loan of KRW 49,00,000 for a loan from Defendant B at the 1216 victim bank Myeonpo-dong, Jung-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City around July 20, 2012, along with a false employment certificate and a lease contract.

Accordingly, the Defendants in collusion with the above D, etc. received 49,000,000 won from the victim and acquired it.

arrow