logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.10.29 2013고단1053
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving a C Eth Motor Vehicle.

1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Measures not to be taken after accidents);

A. On June 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 21:45, the Defendant driven the said car parked on the back side road after the public announcement of the inside-dong of the Mayang-gu, Manyang-gu; and (b) came to start the said road.

At the time, the Defendant attempted to go back, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely examining the rear side while driving a motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was negligent in driving the victim D's D's driving, which was stopped at the later side of the said car, as the Defendant's driving of the said car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, avoided the repair cost of KRW 659,468, such as the exchange of a spread, and escaped without stopping the car and taking necessary measures even after destroying the car to the extent of 659,468.

B. On June 24, 2013, the Defendant got out of the way by means of a victim’s G-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-

In such cases, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by securing a path to the extent that the motor vehicle can enter after driving the motor vehicle in front.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went against the opposite direction by occupational negligence, and was driving the victim Furged on the left-hand part of the furged car at the left-hand part of the furged car.

After all, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, destroyed the above Aburged car to the extent that it is impossible to know the repair cost, and did not immediately stop and take necessary measures, and escaped.

2...

arrow