The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the first instance judgment: imprisonment with prison labor for 1 year and 6 months, and 4 months) of the lower court is too unreasonable; and

2. Each appeal case against the judgment of the court of first and second instances was joined in the judgment of the court of first and second instances. However, the crime of the judgment of the court of first and second instances is in the relation of concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act with the crime finalized on August 27, 2016. The crime of the judgment of the court of second and second instances is

Therefore, each crime of the first and second original judgments cannot be sentenced to a single punishment because it does not constitute a concurrent crime under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act.

In comparison with the original judgment, there is no change in the conditions of sentencing, and instead, the victim B of the first instance judgment submitted a written agreement at the original judgment but submitted a written application for the strict punishment of the defendant on the ground that the defendant did not perform his/her agreed terms and conditions.

In addition, considering the amount of fraud, the criminal records of the defendant, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.