1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. On October 18, 2016, the Plaintiff’s trade name “C” refers to “the visibility of this case” as the Defendant’s intermediary that is engaged in the sales and repair business of master books (PATK PHLPE) 5712R-001 ethylis (hereinafter “public notice book”).

B The Plaintiff 45,00,000 won as a check, paid 42 million won as a credit card, and 3 million won as a credit card. The above sales amount includes 400,000 won as a broker fee received by the Defendant.

At the time, the defendant purchased the above visibility to the plaintiff without compensation for two years after the purchase.

B. On January 19, 2017, the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant to repair on the ground that the time error occurs in the instant visibility, and received the instant visibility upon receiving the notification of completion of repair from the Defendant on the 26th of the same month.

However, as a result of the Plaintiff’s use of the instant visibility, the time error was not modified. On February 23, 2017, the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant to repair again and the Defendant accepted it, but the time error still occurred. The Plaintiff had the same year.

3. Even on November, 198, the above time error was still not modified.

C. Accordingly, on April 7, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) deemed that he/she was entrusted with the repair of the instant visibility to the New World Department Store Construction-Type Repair Business; and (b) the said repair business entity was the same year.

7. 28. 28. The repair of the instant visibility was completed and delivered to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff paid KRW 500,000 to the said repair cost.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, and Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The plaintiff's assertion was made by the defendant, while mediating the sale and purchase of the clock of this case, at no charge for two years. However, the time error generated from the clock of this case was not properly accepted. Accordingly, the plaintiff is entrusted to the food repair business entity.