A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 11:25, 2013, the Defendant demanded a return of the drinking value by asserting that the Defendant had paid the drinking value excessively by using his own credit card when the Defendant drinking alcohol at the above drinking point around May 8, 2013, at the point of “E” operated by the victim D (Inn, 56 years of age) located in Pakistan-si, on September 11:25, 2013. However, the Defendant demanded a return of the drinking value by claiming that the Defendant paid the drinking value excessively by using his own credit card between the victims. However, the Defendant did not comply with this demand, namely, the Defendant expressed the motive that “the breath,” “the boomed the breath to the victim,” and assaulted the victim of the breath (37 mm in length), which is a dangerous thing

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partial police officers of the accused;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Stop photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal investigation reports (F telephone conversations of wooders);

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act), that is against the defendant's wrong recognition, that there is no particular damage

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;