1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On January 19, 2014, the Plaintiff’s basic facts revealed that: (a) the Plaintiff had been in the air to engage in the hedging games while conducting the catal games as a member of the early axis team; and (b) the Defendant, the counterpart team player, was injured by an accident involving the Plaintiff’s face due to his head (hereinafter “instant accident”); and (c) the Plaintiff suffered an injury due to the catal catum, the catum, the catum, and the left-hand side of the catal catum; or (d) the result of the instant court’s physical examination on the head of the Slat University Slat University

2. Summary of the parties' arguments

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant accident occurred is that when the Plaintiff was in Switzerland in order to deal with the public interest left in the public by hedging, the Plaintiff’s face is booming with the Plaintiff’s face without any reasonable rashing it toward the Plaintiff.

The instant accident falls under the category of “serious anti-laws flass” prohibited under the provisions of the Presidential Decree, and the degree of injury suffered by the Plaintiff is very serious compared to the injury that the Plaintiff could normally suffer during the stable games.

Therefore, the instant accident constitutes a tort in violation of the Defendant’s duty to protect the counterpart players or to take safety consideration as a stable player. As such, the Defendant is obligated to compensate the Plaintiff for the expenses incurred in relation to the king medical expenses, such as the king 6,028,79 won (26,500,000 won for replacement of the gys in the future, such as the gysult) and the damages incurred therefrom.

B. The Defendant’s assertion that the instant accident occurred in the process of disputing mutual views between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and only occurred within the risk inherent in the nature of the stable game, and there was no negligence by the Defendant, as a player participating in the stable game, on the part of the Defendant, in violation of the duty of care, such as anti-violations

3. Determination

(a) a person participating in an athletic game may be different from others due to his or her conduct, such as other competitors, in compliance with the Sports Regulations;