(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.10.15 2018고정87

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.10.15 2018고정87

도로교통법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a horse.

On November 25, 2017, the Defendant driven the above router flag on the 15:32th day of November 25, 2017, leading the C entrance distance to the road from the Defendant’s office-run parking lot.

Since the place is linked to a light parking lot and a road, it has the duty of care to live well on the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty and duty

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive the vehicle at the entrance of the parking lot and caused the damage to the victim D ( South, 28 years old) who was parked at the entrance of the parking lot and brought about the back side of the penter on the left side of the penter loaded with the penter.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the above damaged vehicle by occupational negligence in order to fill KRW 1,790,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. Written estimate;

1. Each photograph (the defendant and the defense counsel have contacted the cater and the damaged vehicle, but the damaged vehicle has not been destroyed by such contact;

The argument is asserted.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence of the judgment, i.e., (i) the intensity at the time of shocking the damaged vehicle, (ii) the damaged part is clearly confirmed, (iii) the shocked part and the damaged part are consistent with the witness F’s statement in light of the witness F’s legal statement, and (iv) the considerable amount of the damaged part can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant damaged the damaged vehicle by the Defendant’s occupational negligence as stated in the facts charged.

The defendant and defense counsel shall not be accepted.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act and the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, as well as Article 151 of the same Act;

1.Article 70(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

참조조문

-형법 제70조 제1항

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 논산지원 2021.01.26 2020고단527

-청주지방법원 제천지원 2013.05.02 2012고정160

-대구지방법원 의성지원 2018.01.25 2017고단309

-청주지방법원 2014.11.19 2014고단1139

-창원지방법원 2020.09.24 2019나60230