1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. All the costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Agreement on the partnership of business;

A. On March 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendants agreed to jointly carry out the Mash Manufacturing and Sales Business, and jointly carried out the joint business around August 2014.

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendants agreed to manage offline sales proceeds to the Plaintiff’s account, and online sales proceeds to the Defendant B’s account.

Based on the end of August 2014, 2014, 12,384,560 won were remaining in the Plaintiff’s account and 23,941,93 won were remaining in the Defendant B’s account.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Entry of Evidence Nos. 13, 14, and 15, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendants set the investment ratio of 2:1, and the Plaintiff had the customer management and the production of goods, Defendant C had the product delivery and the Internet site management, and Defendant B had the public relations duties.

As of August 2014, there were 12,384,560 won in the Plaintiff’s account and 23,941,933 won in the Defendant’s account.

In addition, although the inventory quantity at the time of the plaintiff's possession is unknown, it is currently about 700 punishment and it is intended to deliver all of them, it is not necessary to include it in the residual property necessary for settlement of accounts.

Roon is difficult to see that there is a special value, and in general brand development enterprises, the cost of roon production is 150,000 won to 300,000 won and the relationship between D and the defendant B, it should be viewed that roon production was made by each subparagraph.

Ultimately, if the balance of each account, excluding log and inventory goods, is distributed at the rate of 2:1, the Defendants should pay approximately KRW 12 million to the Plaintiff.

B. The Defendants first agreed that the Plaintiff’s investment in KRW 10 million, the Defendants’ investment in KRW 5 million, and the ratio of profit distribution was 60%, and the Defendants agreed that the ratio of profit distribution was 40%, but around March 24, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendants agreed that marketing activities and Internet shopping mall sales are entrusted by the Defendants, and the profits are 40%, and the Defendants are 60%, respectively.