1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's conjunctive claim added by this Court shall be dismissed.

3...

1. Case number of a certificate of non-existence of a claim cited in the judgment of the court of first instance: 2015 Gohap10070: A corporation reporting (list) number: Amount of rehabilitation claim: 206,862,810 : The name of the current head of the title of the Corporation A: D construction work, which the principal has reserved direct receipt of the construction cost due to the failure of national tax payment of the original recipient after April 2015, when the subcontract work in the above field took place;

In addition, according to the decision of commencement of the rehabilitation procedure on April 7, 2015 for your company, the report on the rehabilitation claim and the date of authorization as mentioned above are now in accordance with the decision of commencement of the rehabilitation procedure.

In relation to the above cases, 144,803,967 Won 144,803,967 was directly received from the ordering office by obtaining the above approval of the direct payment from the ordering office, and it is confirmed that there is no obligation for the above rehabilitation claims

In addition, I confirm that all the civil, criminal, and administrative claims and complaints will not be raised in the future.

The reasons for this Court concerning this case are as follows: "1,519,614,150 won" in Section 10,12 of the first instance judgment shall be replaced by the following table; "1,519,614,150 won" in Section 10,612 of the same section shall be read as "1,519,614,250 won"; "the plaintiff" in Section 8-5 of the first instance judgment shall be read as "the defendant"; "the defendant" in Section 8 of the same section shall be read as "the plaintiff"; and the first "the defendant" shall be read as "the plaintiff" in Section 8 of the same section shall be added to "the judgment on the conjunctive claim added by this court"; therefore, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The Plaintiff filed a judgment as to the conjunctive claim, asserting that the instant claim is subject to the Defendant’s original rehabilitation plan and the amendment draft rehabilitation plan, and the Defendant bears the Defendant’s obligation to repay, and that it is identical to the Defendant’s preliminary claim.

However, as examined earlier, it is reasonable to view the instant claim to have been extinguished by the waiver of the Plaintiff’s claim via the instant confirmation document, and even if otherwise, it is viewed differently.