The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the fact that the victims do not want the punishment of the defendant, and that there is no criminal record other than the fine.

However, while driving without a license even though there are many criminal records due to the same type of the crime, such as drinking and driving without a license, the Defendant got the victims of the crosswalk under the pedestrian signals and escaped as they were.

In each of the accidents of this case caused by the defendant, the victims of this case reached four persons, and in particular, one victim suffered serious injury from about 10 weeks in total.

The criminal liability of the defendant is heavy.

In addition, when comprehensively considering the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances leading to the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the conditions of sentencing indicated in the records, such as the conditions of sentencing as well as the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and where the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect them (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015).

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.