logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.05.28 2019구합71647
관리처분계획취소 등
Text

1. The Plaintiffs are multi-family housing among the management and disposal plans approved by the Suwon Market on August 20, 2019.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. In order to implement a housing redevelopment improvement project (hereinafter “instant project”) with approximately 126,830 square meters of land in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant is a partnership that obtained authorization to establish an association on August 25, 2009 from the Suwon-si, and completed the registration of incorporation on September 17, 2009.

B. The Defendant determined the period for application for parcelling-out to the end of February 1, 2017 and March 7, 2017, and received the application for parcelling-out from its members. The Plaintiff was the owner of Suwon-si E-gu, Suwon-si, an area within the instant project zone, and the Plaintiff B applied for parcelling-out as the owner of the F-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the area within the instant project zone, and the Plaintiff B applied for parcelling-out.

C. The Defendant established a management and disposal plan that includes the Plaintiffs subject to parcelling-out, and applied for an administrative disposition plan to the head of Suwon City Mayor.

However, on June 8, 2018, at the time of approving the establishment of the association, the Suwon City approved the management and disposal plan that designates the Plaintiffs as objects of cash settlement, excluding the Plaintiffs as objects of cash settlement, on the ground that the Plaintiffs are not qualified as members, pursuant to Article 39 (1) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”), which belongs to the same household as the father H, who

Recommendations for Mediation

1. The defendant shall publicly supply one unit of multi-family housing constructed by the implementation of the project in this case to the plaintiffs.

2. If the Defendant supplied multi-family housing to the Plaintiffs and obtained authorization for changes in the management and disposal plan, the Plaintiffs withdraw the instant lawsuit, and the Defendant consents thereto.

3. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne respectively;

Accordingly, the Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking the revocation of the part of the management and disposition plan authorized as the subject of cash settlement (U.S. District Court 2018Guhap68262), and both parties to the lawsuit.

arrow