logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.11.25 2016나31903
토지인도
Text

1. The appeal against the principal claim and counterclaim by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) is dismissed, respectively.

2. The appeal costs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts (the process of changing rights for Seoul Mapo-gu C Land and Ground Buildings);

A. As to the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Metropolitan Government 182 square meters (hereinafter “instant site”), the registration of ownership transfer by E on October 13, 1973 and the registration of ownership transfer by F on March 12, 1974 was completed in sequence due to sale and purchase, and the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on October 21, 1982.

B. On the ground of the instant site, around 1973 by the Defendant’s husband G, a house for the assessment of sap and juices (hereinafter “ground house of the instant site”) was newly constructed by the Defendant’s husband G.

With respect to the instant land-based housing, E, around December 1973, completed the registration of ownership transfer on March 12, 1974 after E completed the registration of ownership preservation, and on October 21, 1982, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of sale.

【Change of Rights to Seoul Mapo-gu H Land and Ground Buildings】

C. On November 25, 1969, G completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of sale (i.e., August 16, 1957) and completed the registration of ownership transfer on November 27, 200 due to a consultation or division, with respect to the land adjacent to Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H 116 square meters (hereinafter “instant adjacent land”).

G on December 11, 1978, the G completed the registration of initial ownership as to wooden mentor and extract assessment building constructed on the ground of the adjoining land of this case [17 square meters, 56.1986 square meters, 7 square meters, hereinafter “the building of this case”). On April 10, 1982, G removed the said one house after obtaining a construction permit, and started the construction of a multi-family housing building with bricks and reinforced concrete structure (76.04 square meters, 25.63 square meters, hereinafter “the adjoining land building of this case”) from April 20, 1982.

From the date of completion, G and the defendant used a building adjacent to this case for residential purposes, after G death under the Act on Special Measures for the Adjustment of Specific Buildings.

arrow