logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.09.15 2017고단1483
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On January 7, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months with prison labor for special larceny, etc. in the branch court of the Daegu District Court, and on October 24, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a maximum of four months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny at the Daegu District Court, which became final and conclusive on February 18, 2015, and the said suspended sentence became final and conclusive on February 18, 2015. On October 21, 2015, the Defendant completed the execution of the said sentence.

[2] The Defendant, 1483 of the 2017 Highest 1483, supra, committed a crime, with insufficient living expenses and with a lot of money on the Internet gambling, she was willing to acquire money by deceiving money by using false words as if the Defendant did not report the purchase of goods posted on the medium and high goods trading site without any things.

On April 22, 2017, the Defendant reported the fact that the victim C purchases halog haloge at the trading in the Daegu-gu Hosan-dong, Daegu-gu, and then made a false statement as if he sold the goods by communicating the victim.

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the goods.

The Defendant received KRW 100,00 from the victim C to the new bank account (D) of the Defendant, and received KRW 7,746,500,00 from the victim 63 times in total, as shown in the list of crimes attached to the crime from February 9, 2017 to May 30, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims to receive property.

On May 10, 2017, the Defendant reported that “The Victim E purchases the Victim E-Y Track Track Track Track Mack Mack Mack Mack Mack Mack 1690” on May 10, 201, and made a false statement as if the goods were sold by contact the Victim.

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the goods.

The defendant belongs to this.

arrow