The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment may take into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of each of the crimes of this case and reflects his mistake; (b) the Defendant informed the person who committed the crimes related to narcotics to an investigative agency of the fact that he cooperates in the criminal investigation; (c) the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for ten months on April 28, 2009; (d) the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (e.g., the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc.; (e) the Defendant was detected of Metepia and ampia; and (e) other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments, such as the motive, circumstance, degree of damage, Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and family relationship, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.