The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not state the victim’s words as stated in the facts charged of this case, and the judgment of the court below which convicted the defendant of the above facts charged is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, the lower court can fully recognize the fact of insulting the victim as stated in the lower judgment.

Therefore, we cannot accept the defendant's above assertion.

㈎ 이 사건 당시 이 사건 공소사실 기재 목욕탕에 함께 있었던

H In an investigative agency, among the 20-30 persons who take the same bath in a bath, the victim was “sprinking sprinks. Chewing sprinks. sprinks, female-related promptly, etc. that do not put in the victim’s bath.”

The testimony was made (No. 19,20 pages of the evidence record) and the court of original trial also expressed the desire of the contents similar to those stated in the facts charged in the instant case.

진술하였다( 소송기록 제 40, 42 쪽). ㈏ 피해자는 수사기관과 법정에서 피고인으로부터 욕설을 들은 상황, 그 욕설의 내용 및 그에 대한 자신의 감정 등을 구체적이고 일관되게 진술하고 있다( 증거기록 제 9, 47, 48 쪽, 소송기록 제 71, 73, 74 쪽). ㈐ 피고인도 위 목욕탕 안에서 피해자에게 욕설을 한 사실은 인정하고 있다( 증거기록 제 65 쪽). 3. 결론 그렇다면 피고인의 항소는 이유 없으므로 형사 소송법 제 364조 제 4 항에 따라 이를 기각하기로 하여, 주문과 같이 판결한다.