The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. A favorable circumstance is that the Defendant appears to make a confession and reflect all of the crimes of this case, and that there is a child who must support the Defendant is also a circumstance that can be considered in determining the punishment of this case.

However, since 2004, the Defendant has continuously committed a property-type crime, such as larceny, fraud, and occupational embezzlement, and has been punished four times or more as a crime of occupational embezzlement, each of the crimes of this case was committed in the period of the same repeated crime, and no damage has been recovered until the trial was held. Considering the motive and background of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime was committed, Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the records and arguments of this case, are considered, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.