logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.08.18 2016노383
강제추행
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. A summary of the grounds for appeal by the Defendant and his defense counsel (misunderstanding of the facts) did not have any fact that the Defendant was knee and knee in a passenger car.

A victim's statement cannot be trusted because it is not consistent with the time and place of the victim's injury, the victim's clothes, the victim's clothes, and the statement that he/she had been the defendant at the time of the prosecution.

When the defendant retires from D Co., Ltd. and files a civil petition on delayed payment of wages with the Labor Office, the representative director of the above company must dismiss the victim who is an employee and have the defendant file a complaint.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds of the statement of the victim C, etc. without credibility, thereby misleading the facts and adversely affecting the judgment.

2. The following circumstances that can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the victim, from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below, i.e., the Defendant, while entering the passenger car auxiliary seat, was on the Defendant’s driving in order to prepare for open advertisements, i.e., e., the Defendant’s bucks. from the Defendant who was a financial director of the said company to the court of the court below.

At present, it is easy to do so so, so that it is easy to see that she and her husband and wife are sitting on the side of her husband and wife.

The bank was set up on the buckbucks, by "An excessive play."

“The statement was consistently and specifically made in an important part, and ② the victim was committed an indecent act on May 23, 2015 with the Defendant in a car near the O station located in Suwon-gu N in Suwon-si around 12:00 on May 23, 2015.

Although the statement is stated in the court below, the defendant's defense counsel stated in the court below that "the defendant was in the process of remitting from the company around 11:56 on the day of the case," the victim would have committed an indecent act after around 12:30.

The police officers are on the approximate basis.

arrow