logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.03.09 2016누72244
위탁운영약정 해지 결정 취소 청구 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasons why the court should explain this case are "the reasons why the measure is terminated" of the second judgment of the court of first instance as "the reasons why the entrusted operation agreement is terminated", and "a short name" of the 8th judgment of the court of first instance as "the reasons why the measure is terminated" of the court of first instance.

In addition to adding “Article 56(1)” to “Article 56(2), it is identical to the part on the grounds of the judgment of the first instance, so it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow